Fluency Leaderboard

Ranked by quality of AI-collaboration behavior (the Fluency Rating), not volume. Grinding more turns cannot move you up - only working better can. A self-instrumented measure, not an audited credential.

#	Handle	Rating ↓	Band	Turns	Ctx Eng	Harness	Verify	Diagn	Ctx	Plan	Iter	Und	Scope	volume, not skill
												Commits	LOC	Tokens
1	@demo-novasample	88	Expert	26	-	-	93	89	86	89	83	83	87	-	-	-
2	@demo-valesample	85	Expert	26	-	-	94	93	79	81	83	75	79	-	-	-
3	@demo-atlassample	75	Advanced	26	-	-	74	73	82	73	75	68	81	-	-	-
4	@demo-ridgesample	65	Proficient	26	-	-	55	59	69	86	60	68	70	-	-	-
5	@jd	63	Proficient	5421	-	-	79	63	56	76	56	56	78	-	-	-
6	@demo-solsample	61	Proficient	26	-	-	49	58	67	73	59	64	68	-	-	-
7	@demo-linsample	49	Developing	26	-	-	43	48	52	49	47	53	56	-	-	-
8	@demo-paxsample	35	Emerging	26	-	-	25	39	41	34	31	41	43	-	-	-
9	@demo-koasample	32	Emerging	26	-	-	21	28	33	30	30	43	48	-	-	-
10	@jddavenportprovisional	0	Emerging	0	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-

Profiles tagged sample are seeded demo accounts shown while the board fills in with real users. They span the range so you can read what each band looks like; they are not real people.

Columns labeled volume, not skill (Commits, LOC, Tokens) are output metrics — they do not influence the Fluency Rating. Sort by them only if you want to see who is most active, not who works best.